Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himmer's Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted - no assertion of notability. Neutralitytalk 21:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Himmer's Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Newly (today) coined neologism. TransporterMan (TALK) 19:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for something made up at school one day. The topic does not meet general notability guidelines. Deli nk (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, maybe speedily. Probably falls neatly between the cracks of the speedy deletion criteria (although maybe G3), but there's absolutely no way that one college student's protologism, coined this week, will meet the standards for inclusion. Serpent's Choice (talk) 20:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia isn't "Neologism's 'R Us". ArcAngel (talk) ) 17:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.